Jan 292016
 

We birded two sites in the Barranquilla region. Our first stop, the 4km road outside Palermo, was a location that I saw listed in eBird, with many nice species consistently reported. Its a dirt road that extends straight into a marsh with small fincas scattered on both sides. Our hotel arranged for a driver to bring us from Barranquilla and stay with us while we birded along the road for ~3 hrs. It was a mid-afternoon excursion due to our arrival time in Barranquilla, so it wasn’t optimal for birding, but we were anxious to get into the field. This road doesn’t get much use, and I’m not sure what the locals think of visitors, although we didn’t have any problems. As we soon found out, a smile, a wave, and an energetic “Buenos dias! Como esta?” goes a long way to break down barriers anywhere in Colombia. Because it was dry season (and by ‘dry’ I mean ‘dry’…no rain for nearly three months), it wasn’t so easy to find nearby water in the marsh. We did see a few nice species here, like Yellow-chinned Spinetail, White-headed Marsh-tyrant, Limpkin, Striated Heron, and many Snail Kites, and lifers like Scaled Dove, Cattle Tyrant, Russet-throated Puffbird, Bicolored Wren, and lots of distant Bare-faced Ibis. We missed hoped-for Northern Screamer, White-cheeked Pintail, and White-faced Whistling-duck. A scope would have been very useful here, but we didn’t bring one on this trip. Still, it was a nice beginning for our adventure.

Russet-throated Puffbird

A cooperative Russet-throated Puffbird

Bicolored Wren

Bicolored Wren. We saw…and heard… these guys nearly everywhere on our trip. They are very loud and very vocal.

Scaled Dove

Scaled Dove. Such a neat pattern on these birds.

The next morning we were picked up by Sebastian and brought to Parque Isla Salamanca, a coastal salt water mangrove wetland with a fairly long boardwalk. Our highlights here were a pair of Chestnut Piculets, Pied Puffbird, Common Tody-Flycatcher, Northern Scrub-Flycatcher, Black-crested Antshrike, Red-rumped Woopecker, close views of perched Brown-throated Parakeets, Black-crested Antshrike, the drab Bicolored Conebills, and Straight-billed Woodcreeper. On the non-feathered front we saw a pair of caimans and our first iguana of the trip.  We didn’t find the endemic Sapphire-bellied Hummingbird (perhaps due to the lack of many flowering plants) or Chestnut-winged Chachalaca that are often reported here.

Straight-billed Woodcreeper

Straight-billed Woodcreeper

Brown-headed Parakeet

Brown-throated Parakeet

In the afternoon we continue our drive about two hours further, past Santa Marta and up towards Minca, where we will spend the next six days exploring locations along the road up to the San Lorenzo Ridge.

The next entry: from Minca to El Dorado

 Posted by at 6:58 PM
Jan 282016
 

I am not a fan of cold weather, so when winter arrives here in the northeast I love heading to tropical climates to escape the frozen landscape and enjoy some warm weather birding. This year I decided to head to Colombia for the first time. Colombia hosts more bird species than any other country (>1,900 species!), but for many years was underbirded due to security issues. Although the US Department of State still issues warnings about where to go, what to do, and what NOT to do, things have stabilized substantially, and birders and birding tours are returning to Colombia. In the next few posts I will try to relay impressions from my first birding trip to Colombia.

Colombia map view

A map of the locations that we visit on this trip. Click on the image to access the Google map and to get details of each tagged location.

But perhaps it would be helpful to begin with some broad information and what we tried to do. To get a sense of perspective, Colombia is a relatively large country, slightly larger than Texas and California combined, and 4x as large as Ecuador.  In addition, it is bisected by three arms of the northern Andes (the eastern, western, and central cordilleras) each separated by wide valleys, and also contains coastline on both the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans, expansive high plains (the Llanos), Amazonian lowlands, and the world’s highest coastal mountain range (the Sierra Nevada range) that is separate from the Andes. This size and geographical diversity results in biological diversity, but also creates difficulty for visitors who try to cover too much territory in too little time. So how does a birder cover all that terrain? The big name commercial birding tours that focus on maximum species numbers try to sample much of the country in a single tour, usually over a two-to-three week time frame, with lots of travel time interspersed with relatively short birding stops. That exhausting and frantic pace is not my kind of birding. So instead, my friend Pete and I decided to cover a relatively small area at a more leisurely pace, focusing on the coastal Sierra Nevada range. Commercial birding tours often offer this region as a six day extension, but we decided to cover the same area in a more leisurely twelve day time frame. We contacted Sebastian Ballesteros, a local freelance birder/guide/photographer who along with his brother David runs a small hostel and nature preserve called Faunal, located a few short miles above the town of Minca. Sebastian agreed to guide us for about half of the days and to leave us to bird by ourselves on the other days, resulting in a nice combination of guided and solo birding. Sebastian speaks English very well, which was a great help for two Americans who speak muy poquito Spanish, and provided excellent service. Our version of the ‘Santa Marta extension’ begins in Barranquilla on the Atlantic coast, we’ll spend nearly a week at different altitudes proceeding along the long rugged rocky road that climbs up from Minca to the San Lorenzo Ridge in pursuit of Santa Marta endemics, we’ll return back to the coast to bird in the dry scrub of the Guajira region, and then return for a few relaxing days in low dry forest and a final afternoon in Bogota.

Today we left behind the massive storm that delivered ~22 inches of snow to NJ a few days ago. The timing was fortunate, since there was enough time to clear away the snow and the backlog of flights, and our flights were not delayed. We caught some sleep during a long layover in the Bogota airport, and arrived in sunny Barranquilla ready for some tropical birding.

Pete airport

Pete catching some Zzzzzz’s in the Bogota airport. Proof that the man can sleep anywhere.

Next post: Let the birding begin.

 Posted by at 3:32 PM
Jan 052016
 

Waders
This past June my brother and I took a birding vacation to Trinidad and Tobago, arranged through Caligo Ventures. We had heard about birding at the legendary verandah of the Asa Wright Nature Center, and we’ve seen the book that claims that it is one of the Fifty Places to go Birding before You Die. A detailed description of our experience there can be found on earlier entries into this blog starting here, but now nearly 100 of the photos from this trip have been assembled into a new slideshow quiz. If you have been to Trinidad and Tobago and would like to test your memory, or if you are perhaps planning a trip to this destination, give the quiz a try here.

Verandah birders

Bellbird

 Posted by at 5:49 PM
Dec 312015
 

It’s the final day of yet another year, so that must mean that it’s time to look back at the past year of birding. Here’s my top 10 birding events of 2015.

#10: A month in Florida. For the first time, I had the opportunity to spend a full month ‘snowbirding’, spending the month of January birding, golfing, and just relaxing in shorts in January (!) in central Florida. Two lifers were the result: Nanday Parakeet, which was easy to find based on other reports, and Wilson’s Plover, which we had to search for on multiple beaches until we finally found not one, but seven Wilson’s on Anclote Key. Add to that almost daily  sightings of Roseate Spoonbills, Wood Storks, Tricolored Herons, White Ibis, and Sandhill Cranes, and it all adds up to a great time.
Four Wilson's
#9: Brig sandpipers bonanza. September is the tail end of shorebird season and a great time to look for the tougher shorebirds at Brig, and we were not disappointed. The highlight was a lifer Curlew Sandpiper that was found originally by Harvey Tomlinson and remained for an extended period for many birders to enjoy, but it was joined by a great combination of multiple Buff-breasted, Pectoral, and Western Sandpipers and American Golden-plovers for super views and side-by-side comparisons.
Curlew Sandpiper
#8: White and Black Terns. It was very much a Tern year for me. I spent many hours examining and photographing Common and Forster’s Terns until I could finally identify them with confidence. It’s amazing how much fun you can have with common birds sometimes. That was followed by multiple sightings of Black Terns in the Sedge Islands, Cape May, and Brig, including great looks at feeding birds. I saw more Black Terns this year than I have seen in all previous years combined, with the highlight being the find of a breeding plumaged bird on a canoeing expedition into the Sedge Islands. Just another example of how anything can appear at my favorite NJ summer birding location. These local sightings were followed up with sightings of seven tern species while vacationing in Trinidad and Tobago in June, most of which were lifers.
Black Tern3
#7: Bohemian Waxwings. I have a history with Bohemian Waxwings, where I had seen them in Alaska, but the photos of those birds were lost long ago. Since then I’ve been anxious to find and photograph them in NJ. This year the opportunity arose, with a report from Sandy Hook. I was on a DVOC outing to the North Shore later that week, and at the end of the trip it was decided to try for the Bohemian. We found it, but it was a quick look without any photo opportunity. Ugh. I hoped that one might show up closer to home, and indeed, about a week later while searching for one in the Cedar Waxwing flocks at Island Beach SP, I noticed photographer Kevin Knutsen aiming his camera into the trees. He called out “Bohemian”, and about half an hour later I had the photo that I wanted as it fed along the road at eye level. Can’t beat that!
Bohemian Waxwing
#6: Trinidad and Tobago excursion. Due to my recent transition into retirement, I haven’t had any birding-specific vacations outside the US for several years.  2015 was the year to end that streak. A 9-day trip to T&T yielded 66 lifers, including a few very memorable birds. Bearded Bellbird is now my favorite bird of all time, we documented the first Amethyst Woodstar ever seen at Asa Wright Nature Center (and only the second ever in Trinidad), saw Audubon’s Shearwater resting on land behind our hotel, and had unexpected sightings of White-tailed Tropicbird and Western Reef-heron. It was a wonderful trip.

#5: Gulling at Florence: Glaucous Gull has been a long-standing thorn in my side: one of the birds that I should have seen by now, but somehow it eluded me. I decided to spend some time in the bitter cold of March in Florence NJ, along the Delaware River. My first attempt came up empty, but with nice Iceland and Lesser Black-backed Gulls as consolation. The next trip was a success though, with clear views of my Glaucous nemesis. It was a great feeling. 2016 is the year to find my new nemesis: Philadelphia Vireo.

#4: Bell’s Vireo. This year I spent more time in Cape May than in previous years, including a four-day October house rental right on Lake Lily. Three days later a Bell’s Vireo showed up at Higbee’s Beach WMA. It was prime migration time, so I headed back down there, and was able to see it on two separate trips. It was a great example of how seeing a bird under this kind of circumstance could help to find it in the future, keeping an eye out for its blue legs and fondness for staying low in thickets.
Bells Vireo
#3: Phalarope Day at Whitesbog. August is shorebird time in NJ, and it was a particularly good year for them in Whitesbog that included lifer Baird’s Sandpiper and an adult White Ibis. But the highlight was a day that started out very ordinarily, but ended up being “Phalarope Day”. I went there alone, and after scanning the flats I started comparing notes with three other birders (Larry Zirlin, Jim Shill, and Ernie Hahn). It started innocently enough, with a bird that Ernie saw and I wasn’t sure of that Larry and Jim confirmed to be a Wilson’s Phalarope. As we watched, it would feed, fly occasionally, get lost, appear again, etc. In other words, fun birdwatching. Eventually we went to the other side of the bog to get documentation photos and it miraculously morphed into a Red-necked Phalarope! The Wilson’s was still in view, so we had two phalaropes, both which are rare-to-uncommon for NJ, in view at the same time. It was a great example of team birding; I certainly wouldn’t have found and identified them both by myself.
Phalaropes
#2: Black-headed Gull + King Eider = winter fun. While I was in Florida in January, there were great reports of Razorbills appearing in NJ. I was somewhat envious, so after returning back to the frigid north, I decided to do some “sits” at Manasquan Inlet and hope for some nice birds. One fine day while sorting through the numerous scoters just off shore I was able to find a drake King Eider in the mix. That was super, but was topped by a fly-by Black-headed Gull a few minutes later. Nobody else was there. What a great pair of birds and a super welcome back to NJ!
BH gull
#1: Thick-billed Murre. February was a good month for me at Mansaquan Inlet, topped off by sighting of my lifer Thick-billed Murre. A Murre was spotted the previous day at Barnegat Inlet ~25 miles further south, but instead of chasing it, I decided to sit at the mouth of Manasquan Inlet. I could tell that something was up, as the inlet was FILLED with many more Common Loons than normal. The loons were joined by a pair of Red-necked Grebes near the mouth, but after moving further inward, I spotted an alcid swimming in. The channel is not very broad, so it yielded awesome scope and binoc views and photo ops. As with the Black-headed Gull, no other birders were around. My first NJ alcid was a great one.
Murre and Loon

 Posted by at 10:58 PM
Nov 252015
 

Note: This post is from 2015. For the more recent 2016 update, click here.

When November comes around, I start looking for a bird. I don’t mean that I start looking for a particular species; I mean that I look for a very specific individual. And this morning I found her again: Tundra Swan T207. She and I have a history now that goes back three years. Here’s the updated story.

In November 2013 I became aware of a Tundra Swan with a neck collar that was seen at Whitesbog. Bill Elrick spotted this banded swan but was unable to identify the band number. I went back the next day and was able to read the band identification number through my scope and get documentation photos. After reporting the sighting and photo to the Bird Banding Lab (https://www.pwrc.usgs.gov/bbl/bblretrv/index.cfm), I learned that this swan, T207, was banded about as far away as you can get from New Jersey and still be in North America. This swan was a female that was hatched in 2005 or earlier and was banded in July 2006 20 miles from Nuiqsut on the far north shore of Alaska, which is ~150 mi east of Barrow, and only ~8 miles from the Arctic Ocean. This was the fourth time that this bird was re-sighted since she was banded, with all sightings being concentrated within a small region of New Jersey. In addition to our Nov. 2013 sighting at Whitesbog, she was spotted in Nov. 2011 near Forsythe NWR (38 miles from Whitesbog), in Nov. 2010 ~6 miles from Whitesbog, and the first sighting that I am aware of was by Bob Cunningham in Whitesbog in Nov. 2008. In other words, if we make the reasonable assumption that she is returning to the site in Alaska where she was hatched and banded, then she is traveling ~6,700 miles round-trip between Alaska and NJ, perhaps each year.

T207 traveled at least 3,323 miles from her banding location in Alaska to her winter locations in New Jersey.

It’s 3,323 miles from T207’s banding location in Alaska to her winter locations in New Jersey.

Locations in New Jersey where Tundra Swan T207 has been sighted

Locations in New Jersey where Tundra Swan T207 has been sighted.

The wonderful thing about submitting information such as a banded bird, is that you are drawn into learning more about that species. I learned that Tundra Swans that breed in Alaska travel southwards in either of two patterns. A population that breeds in western Alaska heads southwards towards British Columbia and then travels further south along the Pacific coast, primarily wintering in California, while a second population that breeds on the north shore of Alaska heads eastward from British Columbia, migrating across Canada and the Great Lakes region to the east coast of the US, with most wintering in the Chesapeake Bay region and the North Carolina coast. Tundra Swans are known to live up to 24 years in the wild, but average a 15-20-year lifespan.

I was wondering if T207 would return back to our area, so when the swans returned again last year (November 2014), I drove through Whitesbog occasionally, scanning through the flock of up to ~90 Tundra Swans, hoping to see her again, but to no avail. Did she decide to go elsewhere? Was it too early in the season for her to return? Did she meet an early demise? (although by the aging criterion described above, she is still a youngster). I decided to look elsewhere, and finally, in a flooded bog ~ 5 miles away from Whitesbog (39.90260, -74.54057), I saw a distant bird in my binocs with a neck collar. Could it be her, or another swan visiting from the arctic? After quickly setting up the scope, I was happy to see the identifier T207 on a powder blue neck collar. That meant that she arrived back again in NJ for at least the 5th time in the last 7 years, and remarkably returned to within ~5 miles of where she was spotted in 2008, 2010, and 2013. Somehow it shouldn’t be surprising that birds have the remarkable ability to travel more than 3,000 miles and then navigate back to the same location, but I’m still amazed.

As you can imagine, I’ve been wondering if she would return and be sighted in the area for yet another year. After all it’s 6,700 miles back and forth between here and Alaska, with all kinds of hazards. And if her navigation skills are off by just a little bit, she could end up in a lake just a few miles away and we might never notice her. I’ve been popping into the local bogs around once per week hoping to see her. Today there were only 8 swans in Whitesbog, all collarless. Five miles away in Reeve’s Bog, there was a more impressive group of 93 Tundra Swans, so the odds were better, but on the first scan through, none with a collar. From another vantage point, still no collars were visible. Finally, one more try as the flock raised their heads in response to a passing truck, and this time there it was! A faded, worn, and dirty collar with T207 emblazoned across it. As if it’s not amazing enough that she finds her way back to this area of New Jersey each year, the location that I found her today is a grand total of ~200 yards away from where I spotted her last November.  Now that’s what I call navigation skills!  I’m thrilled that she survived and that we have her back again here in New Jersey for another winter.

T207 2015

She’s back again. A digiscoped photo of Tundra Swan T207, Nov. 25, 2015. Her ‘necklace’ is a bit worn and dirty, but it’s still good to see her.

You can bet that I’ll be looking for her again next year. I’m beginning to wonder who is going to be returning to Whitesbog longer…her or me?

Addendum to this entry: in early 2016, T207 was found in at least two other local lakes, so even though she returns faithfully to our area, she still moves around locally during the season. On Jan. 9, 2016 she was found in Bamber Lake (Ocean County) by Linda Walter, and on Jan. 17 she was found by Bob Cunningham again in Whitesbog. More additions to an already cool story.

_IMG0653

T207 with other Tundra Swans, in snowy Whitesbog, Jan. 17, 2016. Photo by Bob Cunningham

 Posted by at 3:04 PM
Aug 112015
 
Tern

Yes, its a tern, but which one?  Can you identify it with confidence?  If not, then read on.

OK, you’re out birding and you see the excellent individual shown above. Many birders will be able to recognize this bird as one of the medium-sized terns, which here in the eastern US narrows down to Forster’s or Common Tern. But which is it? For far too many birders, this is a tough call. Like many birders, I struggled with these terns for a long, long time. For FAR too long, I felt like I was just guessing when I saw a medium-sized tern, hoping that the habitat would push the odds in my favor (Forster’s Terns prefer marshes, while Common Terns prefer beaches). That was frustrating to me because bird identification should be based on observation of specific features and shouldn’t feel like a coin toss. Well, this year I decided to do something about it and worked at trying develop confidence in identifying these species correctly. (Actually, although I say that I worked at it, that’s not completely true, since this minor quest became an utter pleasure and was the furthest thing from work.) Today I will share some of my thoughts on distinguishing these two species in the hope that my experience might help some of you.

OK, to start us off, let’s admit that distinguishing Common and Forster’s Terns is one of the more challenging bird pair identifications.  Don’t expect it to be entirely  clear, especially when starting out. So what do the field guides tell us to look for on these terns? Well, Forster’s Tern is supposed to have a light orange bill, whiter body and wings, a tail that extends beyond the folded wingtips, and longer legs, while Common Tern sports a deeper orange bill, gray body and darker wings, a tail extending the same length as the wingtips, and with black on its outermost tail feathers. Although all of those points are indeed true, for me they were either difficult to distinguish in the field (Is that bill light orange or deep orange? Is that body gray or does it just look gray because it is shaded from the sun?), or they were difficult to see (the edging on the tail feathers is seldom apparent even in good lighting, and only in flight). Far too often my decision changed depending on the lighting conditions; a bird would look like it had a gray body in flight, having me lean toward Common, and then it banked toward the sun and miraculously it was transformed into a white-bodied Forster’s. Drat. The same thing happened when trying to decide how orange the bill was; a well-lit bill could look light orange (perfect for a textbook Forster’s), and then when the head turned and the bill became shaded, it was suddenly the deep orange bill of a Common Tern. Ugh. I was ready to wave the white flag and surrender.

Now after observing several hundreds of these birds this summer, often in locations where both species are found intermixed, I feel like I’ve finally broken through. Part of the reason is purely the additional experience, and partly its because now I’ve found identification points that work for me. When the birds are resting on a beach or mudflat, I now focus on two features: the color of the folded wingtips and the bill color. For me the folded wingtips are actually more reliable, with the Common Tern having black wingtips and the Forster’s Tern having grayish wingtips. Look at the terns in the photos below and decide purely on the wingtips and you should come to the correct conclusion.

Common tern side view

If we start with the bill color, I would have a hard time deciding if this is a Forster’s or Common Tern, perhaps leaning slightly and uncomfortably towards the darker bill of a Common Tern. But look at the wingtips…they are jet black, unmistakably characteristic of Common Tern.

Forster's Side view

Which tern is it? Start with the folded wingtips. In this bird the wingtips are gray, pointing towards Forster’s. The lighter orange bill compared to the previous photo of the Common Tern confirms the conclusion.

Of course, it helps that in these photos the birds are in nearly perfect lighting and in the textbook profile pose, but we have to start somewhere. For me the bill color is somewhat debatable, but the wingtips aren’t, and using the combination of both leads to a much more reliable conclusion.  To put further icing on the cake, when both species are present together, the comparisons are easier and allow us to introduce one more feature: leg length. Look at the two terns in the photo below and decide what you think they are. Then look at the leg length. Does one of the birds have longer legs than the other?

Common and Forster's Terns2

Decide which species you think these are, note the leg length on these birds, and read on.

When they are side-by-side like this, things get easier; the bird on the left has a deep orange bill and black wingtips (= Common Tern), and the one on the right has a lighter orange bill and gray wingtips (= Forster’s Tern). But note the leg length; the Common Tern has shorter legs than the Forster’s, just like the field guides say. Leg length is hard to judge when they are not closely juxtaposed like this, but can be another supporting feature to look for in mixed flocks.

So that’s what I focus on with resting birds. How about when they are in flight? At times this can also be surprisingly easy. I used to look at the undersides of the bird…the body and wings, whereas now I focus on the upper surface of the wings. For me, looking at the lower wing surface or body was frustrating because it was so dependent upon lighting, and with the sun being above, these areas alternated between sun and shade during flight, turning identification into a guessing game. The upperwings are more often well-lit, thereby allowing for more reliable views. Common Terns have upper wing surfaces that are almost uniformly gray, with a fairly large wedge of black that encompasses at least the five outermost primary wing tips. The upper wings of Forster’s Terns, on the other hand, are two-toned or three-toned, with the distal half of the wing (furthest from the body) being distinctly whiter than the half that is closest to the body, which is gray. There is also a smaller patch of black on the outermost upper wing tips. So instead of trying to determine if the wings are light gray or dark grey (are they kidding?), try to determine if the gray is uniform or two-toned. With practice, you will find that you often can distinguish these two species at a surprising distance by focusing on the upper wing surface. Give it a try. Compare the photos of soaring birds below.

Common in flight

Classic view of a Common Tern in flight. Note that the upper wing is uniformly gray both before and after the ‘elbow’. There is also a fairly extensive black wedge at the wing tips.

Forster's tern4

Forster’s Tern in flight. Note the relative lack of any black at the tip of the upper wings. The distal half of the wings beyond the ‘elbow’ are typically whiter than the proximal half, but its not so obvious in this slightly overexposed view.

One of the interesting things about Common and Forster’s Terns is that (unlike many other species) they are actually easier to identify when they are juveniles or are in non-breeding plumage. Forster’s Terns have a dark patch that is limited to the area immediately surrounding the eye, making them look like they just lost a boxing match, while Common Terns have a black patch that extends from the rear of the eye to the hind neck. Conveniently, in juveniles and in non-breeding plumage, Common Terns also contain a black ‘carpal bar’ on their wings that Forster’s Terns lack.

Forster's tern fall

Forster’s Tern in fall. The restriction of the dark patch to the eye and the lack of a carpal patch both point to Forster’s.

Common tern fall2

Common Tern in fall. Note the black patch on the hindneck, not surrounding the eye, and the presence of the diagnostic carpal bar on the wing.

Both species will have juvenile plumage that has additional touches of brown or ginger when they are extremely young in early summer, but the diagnostic black facial patches are present throughout their first year. The brown or ginger portions of the wing and body plumage wear away by late summer, leaving the mostly silvery late fall plumage shown above.

Juv Forsters Tern

Here’s a juvenile Forster’s Tern. The black eyepatch indicates that its a Forster’s. The ginger color on its body and wings is on the edge of its feathers. Those ginger tips will eventually wear off, leaving the silvery pattern that we saw above. Photo kindly provided by Karmela Moneta.

Common Tern immature

Here is an immature Common Tern in late July for comparison. Note the different pattern in the face compared with the immature Forster’s Tern. The dark ‘carpal patch’ is somewhat visible underneath some feathers. Later in the season this patch becomes much more visible as the overlying feather tips wear away.

During the mid-to-late summer, the presence of these juvenile birds greatly helps to identify the adults. If you find yourself by a large tern flock, watch for begging youngsters, which should be readily identifiable based on the black eye or neck patches, and see if you can identify the parents when they arrive to feed the young. Then watch the parents when they leave to see if you could identify them in flight. I found this kind of conformation and reinforcement to be extremely valuable.

There are a few other identification points that can be helpful, but their use is more limited than the ones discussed above. Forster’s Terns molt a little earlier in the season than Common Tern, so birds that are losing their black cap in July are likely to be Forster’s, whereas those retaining their full black caps in late August are more likely to be Common. This can vary between individuals, but can be fun to follow. Finally, the tail can extend considerably further than the folded wingtips of Forster’s Terns, but this is most easily seen early in the year. Those wingtips will wear away and become shorter as the season progresses and then becomes an unreliable indicator.

Common Tern outer retrices

A final identification point that can be helpful. The outer tail feathers of Common Tern are partially black whereas in Forster’s they are all white. This is usually difficult to see but is fun to look for.

Now that you’ve read this far, I want to point out that despite having all of these identification points, distinguishing these two species still can be difficult. These terns take at least two years to mature, resulting in fully mature birds mixing with first-year birds, they have complex molt patterns, and the brightness of the plumage can change during the year depending on feather wear. Good luck using these identification points. And then we can start working on shorebirds!

ps…in case you haven’t figured it out, the bird in the uppermost photo at the beginning of this post is a Common Tern.

 Posted by at 10:21 PM
Jul 292015
 

Late July is the beginning of the Sedge Island season for me. Last year from late July into September a series of canoe trips into the Barnegat Bay Sedge Islands resulted in great birding on nearly every trip. An excursion there last week was as pleasant as can be, with dead-calm waters reflecting the sky and scenery. Birding was fine but not spectacular, yielding plenty of terns to study, and nice looks at a trio of Red Knots as the highlight. Two out-of-season species on this trip were an interesting plumaged Common Loon and a continuing pair of Black Scoters. Interestingly, from a distance the male scoter appeared to have a white wing, but examination of photos revealed an apparent lack of major flight feathers. Other explanations for this white patch (disease?) would be appreciated.

Birding the sand flats in the Sedge Islands on the calmest day that I've seen here. This is why I keep returning back here. Photo by Karmela Moneta.

Birding the sand flats in the Sedge Islands on the calmest day that I’ve seen here. This is one reason why I keep returning back here. Photo by Karmela Moneta.

Scoter

An adult male Black Scoter with a large whitish patch covering its wing. I assume that it is molting its flight feathers. Scoters are FAR more common here in NJ during winter.

Greg

Yours truly, binding the Sedges. Photo by Karmela Moneta.

Loon

Interesting plumage on this Common Loon. We’re not used to seeing them here in mid-summer. Photo by Karmela Moneta.

IMG_6937a

A trio of Red Knots. Always a nice species to see. Photo by Karmela Moneta.

Today on 93-degreee day there was no better place to be than out on the water. For the second consecutive week, the species that I have come to expect or hope for in these islands (Marbled Godwit, Brown Pelican, Caspian Tern) were absent. A great deal of our time was spent studying the terns in all their varied plumages. The challenge of distinguishing Common from Forster’s Terns has plagued me for years, but I’ve finally reached a level of confidence with these species. The great thing is that here in the Sedges, both species can be seen side-by-side and in multiple plumage stages, making for excellent comparisons.

Common and Forster's Terns

Common and Forster’s Terns side-by-side. Note the red bill, shorter legs, and black primary tips of the Common Tern on the left compared with the orange bill, longer legs, and gray primary tips on the Forster’s Tern on the right.

On our way out towards the inlet, I saw what appeared to be a Black Tern flying past us that unfortunately continued down the channel towards the sand flats. Drat. Darn. That was a species that I wanted to see well. After spending some time at the inlet and returning to the rapidly disappearing sand flats, I noticed a dark and small tern mixed in with the tern flock. Indeed, it was an adult Black Tern just starting to transition into non-breeding plumage. I have seen Black Tern here in the islands, but never in this plumage stage. It was a fantastic sight and yet another example of how anything can appear here. One bird and I was smiling for the next few hours.

Black Tern1

My first breeding-plumaged Black Tern in New Jersey. Yeah!

Black Tern3

Black Tern in flight.

Black Tern2

Adult Black Tern mixed in with some Sanderlings.

Royal Tern immature

An immature Royal Tern amidst a couple of adult Common Terns.

Turnstone and friends

A Ruddy Turnstone pretending to be a Sanderling.

 Posted by at 9:06 PM
Jul 082015
 

Last night I called up Larry and asked if he was interested in joining me for Opening Day. Of course, its too late for Opening Day of the baseball season, so this was an invitation to Opening Day of our Sedge Island canoeing season. Last year we canoed/birded there every week or two starting in late July, continuing to late September, finding good birds on nearly every trip. We even went out there last November hoping for some late rarity. (Hey, we never claimed that we were sane!) This morning we went out on a calm, warm, and slightly overcast day (= perfect conditions) to see what birds we could find in this wonderful location. The tides there, which are surprisingly difficult to predict, were with us, as we arrived at nearly low tide which exposed the extensive sandflats, and the rising tide brought us back to the launch site.

The birds were cooperative too. Larry was particularly interested in finding his FOS Royal Tern (which I hadn’t seen yet either), and within 5 minutes were were watching 4 Royal Terns on the sandflats. It was already a successful trip.

RoyalsAs were were getting ready to leave that area to head toward the inlet, a large bird flew in behind us: Marbled Godwit! We’ve had good luck with Godwits in the Sedge Islands, but I wasn’t really expecting one this early in the season. One of the great pleasures of birding from the canoe is that the birds are relatively tolerant to people. No scopes were needed to get great close looks at this delightful bird with its oversized upswept bill feeding in the shallows.

Marbled Godwit
As we started padding on, 5 more large birds flew in that I initially thought were Godwits, but instead they turned out to be Whimbrels. I wasn’t disappointed though, since seeing six Godwits would have been greedy, and Whimbrels are great to see any time of year. We were doing great with the large shorebirds, also finding multiple American Oystercatchers, including some juvenile birds. Good birds continued throughout the trip, including several Tricolored Herons, ~100 Glossy Ibis, 4 Brown Pelicans, and finishing off with a pair of handsome Black Scoters. I’d classify it as an Opening Day victory.

 Posted by at 4:16 PM
Jun 212015
 

Our final day in Trinidad was spent visiting three locations: the Trincity ponds, Yerrete, and Caroni Swamp. The Trincity pond facility is a water treatment plant that is off-limits to the public, but one pond can be viewed from the roadside. This was fortunate, because a few desirable species were seen within a short time here. Circling above the pond as we arrived was a Yellow-billed Tern, shortly joined by a Large-billed Tern for a nice comparison. Also seen at this location were Purple Gallinule, Long-winged Harrier, Striated Heron, and Osprey (its nice occasionally seeing a species familiar to us!). A short drive away and we arrived at Yerrete, the home of Theo and Gloria Ferguson that they have developed as a haven for hummingbirds. The Fegusons have several dozen feeders in their small yard, which draws 13 hummingbird species on a typical day, including two (Ruby-topaz Hummingbird and Green-throated Mango) that we did not see at the Asa Wright feeders. Theo is an avid photographer of hummingbirds and provides an impressive and informative slide show of his photos for visitors. After bidding adieu to Theo, we drove to Caroni Swamp, just south of the capital of Port-of-Spain.

Large-billed Tern

Large-billed Tern, viewed during our brief stay at TrinCity Ponds.

Green-throated Mango

A Green-throated Mango, photographed in Theo’s garden in Yerrete.

Caroni Swamp is a highlight for many nature-minded travelers to Trinidad, including both birders and non-birders alike. Visitors are taken into the mangrove swamp in motorized boats that carry ~30 passengers, during that time enjoying views of unique animals such as Four-eyed Fish, Tree Boa, Silky Anteater, and Common Potoo that are pointed out by the eagle-eyed guides. Before sunset arrived, we joined five other boats moored along the edge of a large impoundment and awaited the arrival of the star of the show: Scarlet Ibises. And they do arrive, in small groups of 5, 10, or 20 birds at a time, some joining other waders in the shallows, but with most heading straight for trees on the opposite shore. A single Scarlet Ibis circling over the boat alone is a spectacular sight, with a color that is beyond what I have seen in any other bird; I don’t know what adjective is appropriate to describe a nearly constant flight of groups of 5-20 of these impressive birds. During our stay I estimated ~500 Scarlet Ibis flying in and roosting in the trees, but during the prime season, more than 1,000 are expected. It was a fitting ending to our trip, and something to look forward to when you visit.

Waders

Those Scarlet Ibises sure do brighten up a wader flock.

Masked Cardinal

A Masked (Red-crowned) Cardinal, viewed in Caroni Swamp before boarding the boat.

Ibis roost

This is just a small portion of the Scarlet Ibis roost site.

In addition to being a gorgeous bird, the Scarlet Ibis turned out to be a minor landmark, for me, being the 1,100th bird species that I have photographed. Only 900 more to get to 2,000.  Ha ha.

 Posted by at 12:49 PM