OK, so today I want to comment on the identification of scoters. I know what some of you are thinking: “Really? Scoters? Aren’t they easy-peasy?” After all, they are relatively common ducks of our eastern seaboard, there are only three scoter species, and the males have obvious markings. I agree; the males are distinguishable and easily identified.
So as we see, the adult males are indeed simple to distinguish from each other. But for me the identification becomes more challenging when we consider female and immature scoters. Since they constitute more than half of the population, we shouldn’t simply ignore them. For example, can you identify these two birds with certainty? Can we determine their gender or age? If not, then read on.
With regard to the female/immature scoters, Black Scoter is easiest. To me its facial pattern is very reminiscent of a non-breeding or female Ruddy Duck (a bird that might be more familiar to most of us), with the dark cap and contrasting light cheek, which as we soon will see, is very different from the other two scoters. Here is a nice example, followed by a female Ruddy Duck for comparison.
For me the major scoter problem was distinguishing female and immature Surf Scoters from White-winged Scoters. I used to focus on the pattern of the white spots on the face. After all, Sibley has arrows pointing out that the front spot on White-winged Scoter face is more oval, while for Surf Scoter is is vertical. In reality, I would cheat and hope that some white wing feathers were peeking out to make the decision easy. But the problem with looking strictly at the facial pattern is that the spot was often roundish or dispersed, so I couldn’t figure out if it was more oval or vertical, and sometimes there was no obvious spot near the bill. Here’s one example.
After struggling with this problem I went back once again to my big Sibley, and then something happened that happens often with that book…I found more information in there that I had not really paid attention to. It was this panel.
The bill shape of Surf and Black Scoters appears quite similar to me, with the exception of the ‘overhang’ of feathers on the upper base of the Surf Scoter bill. This similar shape is not a problem, because those two species are easily distinguished by plumage features, even from a distance. The point that I hadn’t noted previously is that the bill shape of Surf and White-winged Scoters are very different, so we don’t have to examine the facial spots or hope for the white wing patch to be exposed. White-winged Scoter’s bill has a smile-like appearance to it, being highly curved where it meets the feathers, with the lower ‘lip’ extending far back into the face. Surf Scoter is more triangular overall, with a somewhat vertical angle near the cheek. So if we get a good look at the bill shape (which admittedly is not always possible if they are distant), the identification becomes simple and definitive. Look for this feature when you have a mixed flock of scoters and test yourself with the birds shown below.
The lesson once again is that as often happens when struggling with bird identification, structure (which is consistent) trumps plumage (which is variable).